The Minister of Information and Communications Technology Seyed Sattar Hashemi reiterated that equitable access to quality Internet is the right of people, saying current restrictions are temporary as a result of the wartime security conditions.
He made the statement on Tuesday in an article published in
the Etemad Daily on Tuesday, elaborating on the requirements of digital
governance in the context of the Israeli-US aggression of Iran.
The full text of the ICT minister’s opinion piece is as follows:
Policy-making in ICT should be based on the complex realities
of this field, not trapped in simplified and eroded dualities. In a careful and
pathological analysis and examination of ICT policy-making, it is observed that
sometimes this process is trapped in dualities such as "open or
closed", "internal or external", "independence or
interaction". Today, however, the incorrectness and inefficiency of these
dualities have been proven by numerous evidence, and the country's lived
experience has clearly shown that such formulations not only do not meet
today's needs, but have themselves become part of the problem.
The strategy that has been the focus and emphasis of the ICT Ministry
since the beginning of the President Masoud Pezeshkian’s government and pursued
and implemented at various levels is based on a clear principle: “Neither
digital isolation nor absolute dependence, but intelligent and balanced
development.” This statement is not a slogan; rather, it is the product of a
systematic review of past processes and the summation of a set of instructive
experiences. In the past year, when our country faced unprecedented war and
tensions, the inevitable restriction and disconnection of the Internet at three
junctures was a serious test for all of us, both in government and society.
These experiences showed that digital isolation does not simply mean reduced
access; it directly affects the structure of the digital economy, the
resilience of businesses, the flow of learning, and even public trust.
It is clear that the shrinking market, the reduction of
investment incentives, and the distancing from the global chain of knowledge
and technology are among the consequences that cannot be ignored.
At the same time, global experiences and domestic realities
have shown us that absolute reliance on foreign infrastructure and platforms is
not a sustainable solution. In a situation where cyberwars, technological
sanctions, and geopolitical competition have become part of the world's
everyday reality, the lack of local capacities and infrastructure can expose
the country to serious harm that will not be easily compensated.
Accordingly, the right path and the path forward is not to
choose one of these two ends of the spectrum, but to design a balanced model; a
model in which the development of domestic infrastructure is pursued with
seriousness while at the same time maintaining and strengthening active and
purposeful interaction with the world. This is the point where
"independence" and "interaction" are defined not in
opposition, but in complementarity.
Within this framework, the ICT Ministry is committed to
pursuing two goals simultaneously:
1- Strengthening national infrastructure and increasing
network resilience, and
2- Improving the quality and sustainability of services for
the people and providing equitable and non-discriminatory access to the
Internet.
Accordingly, I have repeatedly emphasized that high-quality
Internet is the right of the people and that any classification and segregation
of access, including what is called class-based Internet or special lists, is
irrelevant in this framework. Naturally, in cases where, for any reason,
programs and measures that differ from this approach are implemented in
practice, it is temporary and urgent in nature and should gradually return to
its rightful course while social and security conditions stabilize. The
formation of different types of access, from official to unofficial channels,
indicates that any restriction can lead to the creation of new and unfair gaps.
Accordingly, the serious concern and priority of the proud ICT
family whose efforts of each of its directors and experts created honor in the
Ramadan War and whose worthy role in serving dear Iran became more apparent
than ever to the science and technology specialists, is to reduce these gaps
and move towards a unified and equitable experience for all users.
In this regard, of course, one important fact should not be
overlooked. Governance in the field of communications is a multi-layered and
cross-sectoral matter. Decision-making in many areas is carried out at a level
beyond a single ministry and requires coordination and consensus at various
levels of governance. However, the ICT Ministry deems itself obliged, as the
custodian of infrastructure development and service provision, to clearly
express expert views based on science and experience, and to utilize all its
legal and executive capacities to achieve a balanced path. A look at global
trends also confirms this approach.
Countries are investing heavily in indigenous infrastructure,
developing domestic platforms, and actively participating in new areas such as
satellite communications, but none have chosen the path of complete blockade or
absolute surrender. These experiences show that success in the digital economy
depends on striking a balance between “preserving strategic assets” and “taking
advantage of global opportunities.” What we need now more than ever is to move
beyond false and costly dualities and move toward decision-making based on
data, experience, and a forward-looking perspective.
The digital economy is no longer a marginal sector; it has
become one of the main drivers of economic growth, employment, and social
welfare. Any policymaking in this area has direct and widespread effects on
people's lives. The ICT Ministry will continue its march along this path not as
a temporary choice, but as an absolute strategy. The path of balance may be
more complex than simple and dual choices, but it is the only path that can
simultaneously guarantee independence, sustainability, and benefit from global
opportunities for the country.